AVALIAÇAO DOS RESULTADOS DA FALA NUMA POPULAÇAO DE PACIENTES COM FENDA LABIOPALATINA CORRELACIONADA COM A CLASSIFICAÇAO DE VEAU, TECNICA DE REPARO CIRURGICO E IDADE DO PACIENTE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63845/dnmsk921Palavras-chave:
Fissura Palatina, Insuficiência Velofaríngea, PalatoplastiaResumo
Objetivo: Avaliar as diferenças nos resultados da fala entre técnicas de reconstrução palatina e correlacioná-los com o tipo de fenda e com a idade dos pacientes no momento da cirurgia. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes não sindrômicos submetidos a correção de fenda palatina no hospital dos autores entre 2010 e 2020. Foram incluídos casos com pelo menos 4 anos de seguimento com registros audiovisuais. A coorte foi dividida em dois grupos etários: 1 a 2 anos e acima de 2 anos de idade. Avaliações padronizadas de fala e nasofaringoscopias avaliaram a presença de insuficiência velofaríngea (IVF). Resultados: Dos 481 pacientes avaliados, 323 foram incluídos. Destes, 172 foram submetidos à palatoplastia com a técnica de Bardach, 47 foram tratados à von Langenbeck, 78 por Veau-Wardill-Killner e 26 pela técnica de dupla zetaplastia. As taxas de IVF foram semelhantes. Pacientes operados com menos de 2 anos tiveram melhores resultados da fala. Conclusão: A fala apresentou melhores resultados quando a cirurgia ocorreu antes dos 2 anos, especialmente com a técnica cirúrgica adequada ao tipo de fenda.
Referências
Hofman L, van Dongen JA, van Rees RCM, et al. Speech correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2023;28:58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05391-7
Trotter C, Choi DG, Roohani I, et al. A single institution 19 year comparison of furlow and straight line palatoplasty techniques in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2024;17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241239203
Salinero LK, Wagner CS, Barrero CE, et al. Speech outcomes and rates of secondary speech surgery from childhood to skeletal maturity following modified-furlow palatoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011056
Koh KS, Kang BS, Seo DW. Speech evaluation after repair of unilateral complete cleft palate using modified 2-flap palatoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:111–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318195ab0a
Kummer AW, Hosseinabad HH, Redle E, et al. Protocols for reporting speech outcomes following palatoplasty or velopharyngeal surgery: a literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002151
Golding-Kushner KJ, Argamaso RV, Cotton RT, et al. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:337–47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0337:SFTRON>2.3.CO;2
Anderson BJ, Fallah KN, Lignieres AA, et al. Predictive Factors for velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary cleft palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2022;59:825–32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211026861
Aboulhassan MA, Aly TM, Akram Khodir MM, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of palatal lengthening after cleft palate repair when a buccal flap is routinely combined with Furlow’s Z-plasty. Ann Plast Surg 2022;88:288–92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002964
Crowley JS, Friesen TL, Gabriel RA, et al. Speech and audiology outcomes after single-stage versus early 2-stage cleft palate repair. Ann Plast Surg 2021;86:S360–S6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002747
Astrada S, Bennun RD. Cleft palate repair: a study between two surgical procedures. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:2280–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006814
Jargaldavaa E, Gongorjav A, Badral B, et al. Primary palatoplasty: a comparison of results by various techniques - a retrospective study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2022;12:27–32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_62_22
Funayama E, Yamamoto Y, Nishizawa N, et al. Important points for primary cleft palate repair for speech derived from speech outcome after three different types of palatoplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:2127–31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.021
Vieira PH, Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CA, et al. Late primary palatoplasty in skeletally mature patients: obstacles and outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:1544–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006390
Denadai R, Sabbag A, Vieira PR, et al. Predictors of speech outcome in posterior pharyngeal fat graft surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency management. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:41–5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005802
Naidu P, Yao CA, Chong DK 3rd, et al. Cleft palate repair: a history of techniques and variations. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004019
Hopper RA, Tse R, Smartt J, et al. Cleft palate repair and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:852e–64ee DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000184
Furlow LT Jr. Cleft palate repair by double opposing Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:724–38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198678060-00002
Kriens OB. Fundamental anatomic findings for an intravelar veloplasty. Cleft Palate J 1970;7:27–36
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
